“Tales of typically normal excitable youngsters going on epic adventures that lifted the heart stirred the soul and haunted our dreams. But it was the palpable sense of adventure that really convinced, giving us youngsters an achievable sense of daydream adventure” — Oliver Pfeiffer
For those who were young in the 1980s, the decade’s movies hold a special place in their hearts. CGI was just coming into its own on the silver screen and fantasy adventures were a staple for children and teenagers alike.
Oliver Pfeiffer takes us back to those halcyon days with his list of the “Top 10 Cult Classic 80s Fantasy Adventure Flicks.” We’ve added IMDb plot summaries as well as a bonus list of movies we thought deserved recognition as well.
Popularity: 100%
“This one’s for connoisseurs of the ‘totally preposterous crap’ school of fantasy cinema. You know who you are: You have all the Warlock sequels on Laserdisc, the complete Leprechaun series on DVD, and go see Uwe Boll movies on opening weekend.” — Luke Y. Thompson of L.A. Weekly
Release: 2007
Runtime: 1 hour, 30 min
Genre: Action, Drama, Fantasy
Language: English/Korean
MPAA Rating: PG-13
Starring: Jason Behr, Amanda Brooks, Robert Forster, Jack Craig Robinson, Aimee Garcia
Amazon Link: Dragon Wars
SYNOPSIS: A young woman possesses the reincarnated power to transform a legendary giant serpent into an omnipotent, celestial dragon with her ultimate sacrifice. But the forces of darkness are out to seize the young woman while her reincarnated lover and his aged mentor stand in their way.
When viewing Dragon Wars, it should be noted to leave your brain at the door. That way, when you start hearing things involving good and evil dragons, reincarnated warriors, and such, you’ll just smile and watch the eye candy. This film is geared toward the sensibilities of young kids. In other words, my six and eight year-olds loved it. The story, what little there is, isn’t of much concern here. For the most part, Dragon Wars is actually kind of enjoyable, in a really dumb, cheesy kind of way – think of a Sci-Fi Channel original movie. As a matter of fact, the only uniquely interesting thing about the movie is that it isn’t an American production, but an Asian one, specifically South Korea.
Supposedly based on an ancient Korean legend, a 200-meter-long evil serpent called Buraki is denied a chance at immortality when two young lovers, who are to perform the ceremony, run away and leap to their deaths in 1507 AD. 500 years later in Los Angeles, the man is reincarnated as American news reporter Ethan (Jason Behr), who as a child was given a powerful pendant by an elderly antiques dealer named Jack (Robert Forster) and now has to find the reincarnated woman, Sarah (Amanda Brooks), before her 20th birthday.
“D-War” is a film that looks and sounds amazing, in theory, but the execution is so poor that you’ll rightfully feel that you’ve been cheated by the time the credits roll. The film’s human players are paper-thin caricatures and deliver cheap, insipid dialogue in scenes that rarely connect. More importantly, when you pay to see a movie called Dragon Wars, you expect it to, at least, live up to its title. The biggest flaw of Hyung-rae Shim’s film is that it barely even does that, focusing most of its energy on a mumbo-jumbo plot about destiny: Dialogue about fate and destiny peppered with more weird names than you can shake a stick at takes up about half the running time, and it just plain confusing. On more than one occasion, a character asks another, “what are you talking about?” and you get the impression that no one really knows the answer.
But you don’t come to a movie called Dragon Wars for the story or the performances. You want to see some tail stomping and some flame throwing. And for a few minutes in the final reel, D-Wars delivers. There are two sequences – an attack on Los Angeles by the armies of evil and the final battle between the good and bad dragon – where D-War finally delivers. In fact, the attack sequence is clearly what the entire film was built around; an impressive battle between flying creatures and helicopters that almost feels like it was transported from a better movie.
“D-War” unfortunately comes off as cousin to the American adaptation of “Godzilla” (1998) than anything that is uniquely Korean. Also, the story seems to take itself a little too seriously, the acting and direction seem mediocre at best, and the execution is flawed; maybe the director was trying to do too much without really working out the material in greater detail first.
All in all, Dragon Wars is what it is, and if you’re interested in it for whatever reasons, then chances are that you know what you’re getting here: Another “B”-grade monster movie. With no blood or nudity, virtually no bad language, and monsters galore, Shim’s picture is suitable for youngsters and delivers enough goofy fun to keep adults from getting too restless. When asked why they liked the movie, my children replied, “because it has giant dragons,” and for kids that’s a perfectly fine rationale.
Goozlepipe Rating:
Liked it
Popularity: 5%
“He taught Russians to enjoy themselves.”
Release: 2002
Runtime: 1 hour, 36 min
Genre: Drama, Fantasy, Historical
Language: Russian, English subtitles
MPAA Rating: N/A
Starring: Sergei Dontsov, Mariya Kuznetsova, Leonid Mozgovoy, Mikhail Piotrovsky, David Giorgobiani, Aleksandr Chaban, Lev Yeliseyev, Oleg Khmelnitsky, Alla Osipenko, Artyom Strelnikov, Tamara Kurenkova, Maksim Sergeyev, Natalya Nikulenko
Amazon Link: Russian Ark
SYNOPSIS:The single-shot story involves an 18th century French diplomat, the Marquis de Custine (Donstov), who embarks on a sort of time travelling tour of the Hermitage, opining on Russian art and history with a Russian acquaintance (voiced by Sokurov himself, off camera). Among those they encounter on the way are Peter the Great (Sergeyev), Catherine the Great (Kusnetsova), and Tsar Nicholas II (Baranov) and his family at dinner.
In the beginning, Russian Ark’s invisible narrator speaks softy, “I open my eyes and I see nothing,” to a blank screen. The narrator speaks also of some unspecified accident and suddenly a group of revelers in 18th-century costume disembarks from their carriages at a side entrance to St. Petersburg’s palatial Hermitage (virtual tour), and the fantastic voyage begins.
Russian Ark is a single 96-minute tracking shot in which the narrator and a 19th-century Frenchman, apparently the Marquis Astolphe de Custine, accompany a lively group of characters across several centuries through 33 rooms of the world’s largest museum. Indeed, Russian Ark might have been inspired by the description of a Hermitage ball in an 1839 letter by the marquis himself: A procession “proceeding from one immense hall to another, winding through galleries, crossing the drawing rooms, and traversing the whole building in such order or direction as the caprice of the individual who leads may dictate.”
Russian Ark took over four years to finance and organize. Some 2,000 costumed actors, extras, and the Mariinsky Theater Orchestra, rehearsed for seven months. The camera peers through windows and strolls around the artworks. People slip and fall and sidle through our field of vision on cue.
This is, without a doubt, one of the most visually beautiful films I have ever seen. Often I realized I was looking at the paintings and costumes, rather that pay attention to the characters. The whole journey is a strange mix of stunning sets (the museum) and an ensemble of characters that are morose, manic, and cryptic all at once.
Some might argue that this picture is nothing more than a well-orchestrated guided tour. Maybe it is, but one has to feel while watching it, that there is more to the story even if they don’t necessarily “get it.” Nevertheless, after the initial intoxication of the non-stop camerawork has dissipated, the film feels progressive dry and confusing. The Heritage museum might be “the ark of the Russian soul”, but this film does not do Russia justice.
Trivia: Russian Ark was shot on high-definition digital video attached to a custom-built hard drive. There were evidently three short false starts and then the entire movie was shot straight through on a late December day with only four hours of sufficient existing light. The sound was subsequently layered and the images sharpened in digital post-production.
Goozlepipe Rating:
Didn’t Like It
Popularity: 1%